【逃犯条例】大律师公会罕有召集思会　戴启思吁会员共谋香港出路

香港大律师公会主席戴启思向会员发信，呼吁出席10月底举行的集思会，讨论香港面临的危机，助政府在当前局势之下寻找出路。

政府仍未找到合适政治方案　公会冀提出建议

戴启思在信件开宗名义就表示，香港面临一场危机，需要政治解决方案，但现时似乎未能找到。他理解到会员经常向政府提出意见，包括政治改革，以找到解决香港难题的出路。

信件指出，大律师公会亦已准备协助政府寻找出路，当中不会只有支持单一政见的方案。因此，戴启思代表公会，邀请会员出席10月底的集思会，以讨论香港面临的危机。

希望找到最符合社会利益出路　强调谴责一切暴力

他表示，该会议将会征询各会员对解决危机方案的建议，希望能够找到最有效且最符合社会利益的出路。

戴启思提到，近月公会发出8份声明，又重申公会提醒人们，游行集会等活动是有限制，并谴责一切形式的暴力行为，当中包括损毁财产、投掷汽油弹等。

指警队如出现系统性违法　比任何事都蚕蚀法治

有人提出，部份声音只着重警方使用过度武力，忽视示威者使用的武力程度更高。戴启思表示，法治的概念亦包括政府行为必须符合法律规定，并接受有效的审查和法律规限。警方作为政府执法部门，拥有使用枪械及其他非致命武力的权力，以维护社会秩序及公共安全。

他强调警察必须要在法律规限下做事，法治要求警察必须避免严重违法行为，如果出现这些行为，就要指出、调查以及起诉。任何警队内部系统性、由上级纵容的违法行为，都是敲响警号的（alraming），因为不负责任的政府人员向市民行使暴力，比起任何事情都更加蚕蚀法治。

对蔡维邦离职感到遗憾　冀对方重返公会

信件最后提及前副主席蔡维邦辞职一事。戴启思表示感谢对方过去出色的贡献，对于他坚持辞职感到遗憾，并希望他有一天能重返公会。

戴启思信件全文如下：

Dear Members

You know that Hong Kong faces a crisis. It is a crisis that requires a political solution, yet none seems to be forthcoming. Individual members may, of course, always try to assist the HKSARG to engage on sensible proposals, including political reform, that may lead to a way out of the troubles that afflict Hong Kong.

The HKBA is prepared to assist the HKSARG in trying to find a solution, but it will not espouse a particular solution for politics' sake, Political partisanship is professional anathema and runs contrary to the Association's Rules and Regulations (R&R).

On behalf of the Bar Council, I will be inviting you to attend a meeting of HKBA members on a date to be fixed by the end of October to discuss the crisis that Hong Kong faces.

This meeting is intended to be a brainstorming meeting to seek members' views on possible solutions to the crisis and how best the Bar can assist the HKSARG to find a path to its resolution and to reconciliation in the best interests of the Hong Kong community, within the HKBA's constitutional limitations in the R&R.

In looking at what might be done, it is worth reflecting on what the Bar Council has been doing these last few months.

It has published no fewer than eight formal statements since June 2019. Summaries are as follows:

-13 June 2019: In light of the violent clashes between police and protesters outside the Legislative Council (“Legco") Complex on 12 June 2019, HKBA condemned acts of violence perpetrated by any party. It noted with grave concern that video footage showed excessive and/or improper use of force against non-violent protesters and journalists. It urged members of the public to exercise patience in expressing their views. It urged the Government to engage in dialogue with the community and to re-consider its stance on the extradition bill.

-21 June 2019: After the Government's decision to suspend the extradition bill, HKBA urged the Government to withdraw the bill altogether, and fully consult the public in any future plan to revive the issue of surrender of fugitives and cross-order legal assistance with the Mainland. It also urged the Government to set up an independent inquiry to investigate into various events which had seen injuries to both protesters and law enforcement officers including guidelines (if any) on the use of force by the police against protesters.

-5 July 2019: After the forced entry of protesters into the Legco Complex in the small hours of 1 July 2019, when some individuals committed a variety of criminal offences, HKBA reiterated the importance of maintaining law and order which is an important aspect of the Rule of Law. It stated that the Rule of Law also includes other important components such as an accountable government, effective checks and balances and an independent judiciary, and urged the Government to respond in a sincere way to the demands voiced emphatically by the public. It also renewed calls for an independent inquiry to be set up, pointing out that the legal powers of a commission of inquiry appeared more effective than the powers belonging to the Independent Police Complaints Council (IPCC) which is currently undertaking an investigation into the relevant events.

-24 July 2019: HKBA condemned the violent attack on ordinary unarmed citizens and journalists in the West Rail Station in Yuen Long. The circumstances of the attack raised questions about the

provide prompt and effective protection to citizens, the actions of the police in the immediate aftermath of the attacks, and the role of the police and some of the senior officers in handling the attacks. HKBA repeated its call for an independent inquiry to be set up.

-2 September 2019: HKBA condemned acts of individuals which constituted serious obstruction and interference with the operation of the Airport and the MTR in open defiance of court orders against such acts which represented a flagrant assault on the Rule of Law. It also called on the Government to address the frustration felt by the general public about its continued silence in the face of strong demands for constructive engagement to resolve the current crisis.

-3 September 2019: HKBA referred to various incidents which had seen some police officers using excessive force against protesters, including the indiscriminate use of teargas inside an MTR station, shooting of crowd control projectiles at shoulder height and at close range, and attacking passengers with batons or pepper spray inside a train compartment at the Prince Edward Station on 31 August 2019 without any apparent lawful justification or excuse. It condemned any abuse of power by the Police Force, noting that any unwarranted and excessive use of force by law enforcement officers, who are equipped with public authority and lethal and non-lethal weapons, cannot be condoned. HKBA reiterated its call for an independent inquiry.

-13 September 2019: Noting that a group of protesters called for the resignation of the Chief Justice on account of what they saw as overly lenient treatment of protesters by the Courts in granting bail, HKBA deplored any attack on the Judiciary. The statement sought also to explain the public a presumption for bail for the accused and the procedure by which the Courts consider bail applications.

-30 September 2019: HKBA deplored unwarranted abuse by some members of the public against a Senior Public Prosecutor involved in bail application of a protester who was refused bail in the court building. It explained the role and duties of prosecuting counsel in a criminal case, and urged the public to exercise reason and restraint.

The Bar Council made these statements in discharge of its obligations under Rule 2(b) of the R&R to safeguard the Rule of Law. They cover areas where the Council felt there was a need to explain to the public why the Rule of Law was threatened.

Apart from commenting on the proposed extradition legislation, it was constrained also to issue statements about matters affecting the administration of justice. One concerned unwarranted attacks on judges. Another concerned the intimidation of a government counsel who sought to do his job when opposing a bail application made by a protester.

The Bar Council has reminded people that protests have their limits. It has condemned all forms of unlawful violent behaviour. It hardly needs saying though that assaults, destruction of property, hurling petrol bombs and other violent acts cannot possibly be condoned or excused. That is something that does not need to be repeated every week.

Some have questioned the Bar singling out instances of apparent excessive force by police officers. It has been said that some of the protestors' violent acts were far worse, and police officers have a tough task to perform.

The reason why the Bar Council spoke out about use of excessive police force and failure to protect citizens when required is that it is axiomatic that Rule of Law embraces the notion that all Government's acts must comply with the law and be subject to effective review and legal scrutiny.

The Police Force is an executive arm of the Government equipped with powers to use firearms and other non-lethal weaponry to enforce the Criminal Law and maintain public order and public safety.

Police officers need to always act within the law. The Rule of Law requires that serious wrongful conduct on the part of police officers must be prevented and, if occurring, be identified, investigated and prosecuted if the circumstances warrant.

Any suspicion that unlawful acts by police officers were systemic and condoned by superiors is alarming. There is nothing more corrosive to the Rule of Law than violence inflicted on members of the public by apparently unaccountable state agents.

After the meeting the Bar Council will consider members' views when formulating its approach. I will attend the meeting with other Bar Council members to hear members' views and to respond to members' questions and suggestions.

Finally, I should record my thanks to Edwin Choy S.C. who resigned the post of Vice Chairman last week. I have written to Edwin on behalf of the Bar Council to thank him for the sterling service he has given the Council over the past few years. I regret that he found it necessary to resign because I valued highly his contributions to the decision-making of the Council which, as you will know, is largely achieved by arriving at a consensus view. I hope that he will return to the Council one day.

Yours sincerely,

Philip Dykes SC Chairman